• Hot Topics

  • Links

    • Case Review Form

      * Denotes required field.


      * First Name

      * Last Name

      * Email Address

      * Phone Number

      Cell Phone Number

      Office Phone Number

      Street Address




      Zip Code

      Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

      Date of birth of injured person

      Name of medical device:

      Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the device:

      Other Info:

      No Yes, I agree to the Parker & Waichman, LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

      Yes, I would like to receive the Parker & Waichman, LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

      please do not fill out the field below.

Faulty Battery Prompts Medtronic Pacemakers to be Recalled

Filed December 4th, 2015 Lillian Chiu

Medtronic recalled nearly 100,000 InSync III pacemakers due to a potential battery defect. The problem, Qmed reports, is that the battery may have an unexpectedly high impedance, which may impair proper functioning if there is inadequate current. According to Qmed, the battery defect could lead to loss of pacing capture, erratic behavior, fluctuations in longevity estimates, and inaccurate lead impedances. More than 9,300 units in the United States are affected. A total of roughly 96,800 pacemakers were recalled. At least 22,000 patients worldwide have the pacemaker implanted.

There was a report of one patient death where the faulty battery may have been a contributing factor, Medtronic said.

The recall has been given a Class 2 label by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Class 2 recalls are for products that may lead to reversible adverse health effects or have a remote chance of serious health consequences or death.

Medtronic issued an Urgent Medical Device Correction to doctors, stating that it was aware of 30 cases affected by the battery issue. In its letter to physicians, Medtronic said β€œit is not possible to identify which devices might fail or when they might fail. The issue cannot be mitigated by programming changes or increasing patient follow-up frequency.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Latest Medical Device News

Click Here Now, to Have an Attorney Answer Your
Medical Device Injuries Questions
No Cost - No Obligation!